تووت من أجل غزة وبيروت » Analysis
toot for Beirut & Gaza | A blog covering the war on Lebanon & Gaza
header image
inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Archive for Analysis

Israel’s Political and Military Defeat

Over the past month, Israel has suffered an embarrassing military and diplomatic defeat in its war against Lebanon and Hezbollah. For the first time in decades, an Arab and Muslim force has been able to stand up to one of the strongest militaries in the world. There will be a new Middle East, but not the one Condolezza Rice had in mind a few weeks ago.

The changes made to the American-French resolution that was passed today were a result of the diplomatic pressure by the Arab delegation that was sent to the Council last week. The compromises made also came as Israel and the US realized that this war cannot be won by Israel without causing serious risks of severe instability in various autocratic countries in the region.

A brief look at UNSC resolution 1701 shows the significant changes and additions that were made to put an end to Israel’s aggression against Lebanon. The new resolution includes a call on Israel to withdraw completely from Southern Lebanon as well as from the occupied Sheba’a Farms. A prisoner exchange between Lebanon and Israel is also to be arranged according to the resolution.

Israel has suffered huge losses on the military front, losses it hasn’t suffered for decades. The IOF was forced to call in more than 30,000 reservists to help with the war on Lebanon and maintain the occupation of Palestinian territories. More than 1.5 million Israelis are hunkered down in shelters while thousands of others have already decided to pack up and leave the country. New opinion polls show that only 20% of the Israeli public believes that their military will win the war. Public support for Prime Minister Olmert and War minister Peretz has declined dramatically over the course of the war. This has resulted in Olmert accepting resolution 1701 and asking his government to do the same. The Israeli government and military want to put an end to a war they cannot win except by cowardly dropping US-made smart bombs on shelters full of civilians. When it comes to on the ground battles against Hezbollah fighters, the weakness of the IOF is obvious. In the international arena, Israel is clearly alone, except for its partners in the US. Even in the States, many have begun to question their governments unrelenting support to a government bent on destroying Lebanon and any other Arab country it can put its hands on.

The unanimous agreement on resolution 1701 proves that Arab countries do have some leverage with the US and in the UN. One wonders, however, if the same power will be used to end the suffering of the Palestinian people. This war will definitely have an impact on the course of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land, although one has to remember that many Arab countries as well as Europe and the US have interests in Lebanon that are not existent in the Occupied Palestinian territories.

The dramatic shift between power among Arab countries was also highlighted during the diplomatic efforts that were taken to end this war. While Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan began with a condemnation of Hezbollah and its “uncalculated adventures”, resolution 1701 passed with the help of the Emarati and Qatari officials who went to the UN to ask the US and France to place more pressure on Israel to end its aggression and withdraw its troops. While the former three Arab countries appear to have more weight and power in the region, the opinions of the leaders which were in clear opposition with that of their constituents have questioned their ability to remain among the movers and shakers in the region. The strong reaction of the Arab street to the Israeli aggression as well as their to their leaders’ condemnation of the resistance was a wake up call for Arab autocrats who began to restate their opinions and review their political strategies fearing an even stronger reaction that could result in destabilizing their positions of power domestically and regionally.

The war has also proven that Israel should not be dealt with diplomatically. Israel is a country founded on war and established by military occupation. It does not understand the language of diplomacy; rather, it only understands the language of Katyusha rockets and military body bags. When Israel suffers a military defeat, it is then forced to accept political concessions. This is exactly why countless attempts to forge peace treaties and accords with the Palestinians have ultimately failed as Israel continued its aggression and occupation against a weakened population despite international condemnation. It is also why Israel continually disregards international law and dozens of Security Council resolutions mostly regarding the Occupied Palestinian Territories. As long as it is not losing its young military men and its Merkavas, Israel will continue to disregard any calls from the international community to stop its state sponsored terror machine.

While most of the world has seen and understood what Israel is doing to millions of innocent people, the question remains if and when the United States will realize that its blind support to Israel is only causing more instability in the region and danger to its own people and its position as the superpower of the world.

originally posted at my occupied territory

5,965 Views Email this post

What’s happening in Lebanon now?

Wow! Good news! The war will stop soon, it’s a matter of days! Bla Bla Bla  

Well I think there is more destruction and killing on the way, can Israel stop without committing a few more massacres? 

In any possible scenario, Lebanon is a victim of this war. I tend to believe the scenario where America persuaded Israel to take the opportunity to secure the north by neutralizing Hizbullah, which could lead to a solution with Lebanon, or at least a weaker Hizbullah with international forces in the south most probably. 

It’s not working for America in Iraq, and going into a possible war with Iran (after striking nuclear reactors and key targets) will not be easy at all, the security council gave Iran till the end of August to stop Uranium enrichment, so I do not foresee a war anytime soon, at least not until mid 2007. Israelis will be needed in that possible war, but of course they should not be distracted by Hisbullah or Syria. 

So why not attack Lebanon now, kill many people (who cares), have Hizbullah fire most of its missiles and then have international forces secure Israel’s north in the meantime? Probably Iran at the same time wanted to strengthen Hisbullah in the north of Israel in an attempt to prevent an imminent American/Israeli attack, or at least have a thorn in their throats. 

Maybe, maybe not! What’s certain is that Lebanon is a victim here. 

1,171 Views Email this post

Results of the war after 19 days!

1/ Human Toll in Lebanon
- 600+ civilian deaths, a third of which are children (this number might double once rescue workers are unable to reach 13 inaccessible villages where bodies are buried underneath destroyed residential buildings)

- 65 killed and wounded (mostly women and children, many handicapped) in Qana when an Israeli air strike leveled a four-story residential building used as a shelter by refugees

- 1,600 injured civilians

- 750,000 refugees (representing 12% of the population), of which 100,000 are sleeping in empty schools, parking lots and public gardens

- 4 international UN observers killed in an attack on their post in Khiyam even though the UNIFIL had warned the Israeli army several times that they were hitting too close

- 2 Indian UN peacekeepers wounded in an Israeli air raid on their post

- Attempts at creating a humanitarian corridor unsuccessful because of the destroyed bridges and roads that do not allow access to the villages that have the greatest humanitarian needs in the South

- Inability for ambulances and civil defense crews to reach areas with heavy civilian casualties because of intense bombardment

- Only 10% of the humanitarian aid needed has arrived to the country by ship or plane

- Refusal by Israel to allow for a 72-hour truce as requested by Jan Egeland, the UN’s top official for humanitarian relief, to evacuate the wounded, the children, the elderly and the disabled from the crossfire

- Bombing of a medical convoy from the Emirates

- Bombing of 2 Red Cross ambulances (Israel claims that Hezballah uses ambulances to move weapons, yet there has been no proof of that and only civilians have died when these ambulances were attacked)

- Bombing of 3 hospitals

- Bombing of fleeing civilian cars and buses

- Over 4500 air attacks mostly on villages where civilians haven’t been able to evacuate because of the bombings and destroyed roads

2/ Human Rights and War Crimes implications for Israel

- The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights claims that Israel’s actions in Lebanon could lead to the prosecution of its military commanders. Statement issued suggesting that the failure to spare civilians is a clear violation of international criminal law.

- Human Rights Watch claims that Israel has used artillery-fired cluster munitions in populated areas of Lebanon. Researchers on the ground in Lebanon confirmed that a cluster munitions attack on the village of Blida on July 19 killed one and wounded at least 12 civilians, including seven children. Human Rights Watch researchers also photographed cluster munitions in the arsenal of Israeli artillery teams on the Israel-Lebanon border.

- Human Rights Watch claims that Israel may be guilty of war crimes, citing: the destruction of about 60% of a nine square blocks area of southern Beirut composed mostly of apartment buildings, attacks on the village of Srifa, in which 10 houses were destroyed and at least 42 civilians killed, attacks on a vehicle of villagers fleeing Marwaheen, in which 16 civilians were killed. All these events took place despite the alleged absence of legitimate military target in sight.
- Blackened bodies of children and civilians are showing up in hospitals with no sign of being burnt (hair is still present) indicating that Israel is using weapons with toxic material. Tests indicate the presence of an unidentified chemical substance. The Human Rights Watch is still to verify whether Israel is using phosphorus in their weapons.

- Amnesty International has denounced “blatant” violations of international law and called on the UN to deploy an immediate fact-finding mission to investigate attacks against civilians and other breaches of international law.

- Amnesty International has also called for an arms embargo on Israel and Hezbollah amidst concerns on the transfer of weapons from the US to Israel, via Britain

3/ Infrastructure, Economical and Industrial Toll (overall losses valued at more than 2 billion dollars)

- Air, sea and terrestrial blockade

- Bombing of the Beirut International Airport

- Bombing of the Rayak military airport and Qaleiat domestic airport

- Bombing of the ports of Beirut, Jounieh, Tripoli and Tyr

- Bombing of the roads from Beirut to Damascus

- Destruction of at least 5000 private homes and residential buildings in villages in the south of Lebanon, in the south of Beirut and in the Christian center of Beirut, Achrafieh

- Bombing of hundreds of firms and industrial factories (losses valued at more than 150 million dollars)

- Destruction of the main Lebanese milk factory, « Liban LAIT », of a tissue paper factory, a bottle factory, a packaging firm and a wood plant

- Bombing of food and humanitarian trucks

- Destruction of all the main bridges (at least 100 bridges, most of them newly built, including Mdairej bridge, the highest one in the Middle East, which cost an estimated 44 million dollars), dams and overpasses

- Destruction of all more than 600km of roads in the south, making it impossible for civilians to flee their villages

- Bombing of religious symbols: Imam Ali mosque (Baalbeck) and prayer centers

- Bombing of most power plants, power stations, sewage plants, water facilities, fuel stations and transport trucks

- Bombing of the historical port of Byblos resulting in a huge oil spill

- Destruction of the historical headlight of Manara

- Bombing of Lebanese military barracks and radar installations which are not supposed to be weakened or involved in the fight

- Bombing of the telecommunication infrastructure (losses valued at more than 15 million dollars): mobile networks of Faraya, Jounieh, Zghorta (in the Christian areas), radio antennas, TV stations LBC and Manar

- Biggest ecological crisis ever in the Mediterranean resulting from the bombing of the Jiyeh power plant: 10,000 to 15,000 tonnes of oil have spilled into the sea, affecting not only 1/3 of the Lebanese coast, its sea life and marine ecosystem (including the endangered green turtle), but also the coasts of Cyprus, Syria, Turkey, Greece and Israel. This oil spill is of the size of the Erika oil spill that affected Spain and France but its impact more serious considering that it is not an open ocean as with the Erika oil spill.
- In 18 days, all 15 years of reconstruction efforts have been shattered. Lebanon’s fragile democracy is now the weakest it’s ever been, both in its ability to function and in the eyes of its people, thanks to Israeli aggression.

4/ Progress with Israel’s war objectives

- Hezbollah is still firing rockets and has threatened to hit the center of Israel

- Hezbollah doesn’t seem to be weakened despite IDF allegations and will even emerge stronger as they are now viewed as heroes across the Arab world

- Iranians are volunteering to help Hezbollah in their fight

- Al Qaeda vows to avenge Israeli onslaughts on Lebanon and threatens Israel and its allies

- The world has become a more dangerous place as the potential for new terrorists and terrorist acts is increasing daily fueled by the anger and hatred that is being bred by this war which instead of targeting Hezbollah militants has targeted Lebanese civilians and has completely destroyed Lebanon

- These events are damaging Israel and the US’s image around the world and is breeding more hatred, particularly in the Arab and Muslim world and amongst existing terrorist groups. Not to mention that it is alienating Israel and the US from their allies.

- The risk that the war spreads out in the region is very real

- Now that the one and only multi-confessional democracy in the Middle East has been completely weakened and brought back “20 years in time” as per Israeli military objectives, Bush’s goal of creating “a new Middle East” is starting to look more and more like his Iraqi ambitions

In conclusion

“War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace.”
Thomas Mann

+ Bob Via Shaعtalization

5,402 Views Email this post

Just thinking…

I was thinking of all what’s happening in Lebanon now, and trying to figure out when all this started. The late Rafik Hariri resigned on 20 October 2004 and was assassinated on 14 February 2005, till now I do not understand what happened and why, but no doubt it was a turning point for Lebanon. This resulted in ending the Syrian military presence in Lebanon by withdrawing its forces and ceasing intervening in internal Lebanese politics (which is still debateable) due to the Lebanese request and foreign pressure for implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution 1559 (September 2, 2004).
 

The resolution also called on all Lebanese militias, mainly Hezbollah, to disband. Of course this did not happen. The Lebanese government responded by saying:
“The national resistance which is confronting the Israeli occupation is not a guerrilla and it has no security role inside the country and its activities are restricted to facing the Israeli enemy. This resistance led to the withdrawal of the enemy from the bigger part of our occupied land and is still persistent to free the farms of Shebaa. Preserving this resistance constitutes a Lebanese strategic interest with the aim of relating the struggle with the enemy and regain all the Lebanese legitimate rights achieving and at the forefront the withdrawal of Israel from the farms of Shebaa and the return of the refugees to their land.”
 

Then came this war, which god knows how many people it will kill and what results it would impose. It might be that all these events are linked, starting from the UN resolution till now. I am thinking of many conspiracy theories, starting from the assassination of the late Rafik Hariri ending with the possible result of this war. Who really wants a Lebanon without resistance?

1,034 Views Email this post